Re: caveat: GNOME 2.6 severly broken on Debian/unstable?
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:36:39 +1000, Ian Wienand <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
Ian> On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:13:16PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>> I ran gdb on the two apps I've noticed exhibiting this problem -
>> regchrome & gnome-session, both have the bundle loop issue
>> described earlier in this thread, and both are in the same
>> location in gnome_program_init(), which is part of libgnome.
Ian> You can use the updated libgnome at
Ian> until this is sorted out properly.
It looks like libgnomeprint may also be affected. I (finally)
switched from lprng to CUPS today and as a result, gnumeric won't
start up. It turns out that gnumeric gets stuck in a tight loop
inside libgnomeprint. Looks like another one of those
What's the status of getting these problems fixed properly? It would
be good if we didn't have to find them one by one the hard way.
As a workaround, I dropped:
#LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs
from libgnomeprint-2.6.2/debian/rules and rebuilt the package. Now
gnumeric works fine again.