Re: Bug#252957: FTBFS (unstable/m68k/ia64): inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm'
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I contacted upstream about this and he had a totally different
> opinion:
gcc developers disagree, we had same problem with the kernel, e.g. see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107475162200773&w=2
There is nothing broken with the compiler and changing the constraints of
the memory operand to a "=m"/"m" pair is correctly understood by all
versions of gcc.
bye, Roman
Reply to: