Re: Testers needed: is smartmontools 64-bit clean?
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:51:32PM -0500, Bruce Allen wrote:
> > Grant,
> > Thanks for sending this -- I noticed a couple of things that seem odd, so
> > I am going to make some inquiries. So I may ask you to do some more
> > testing if we find something that's broken and needs fixing.
> Here's the happ64 output. Summary is it seems to work fine too.
> That's a 32-bit user space with 64-bit kernel.
Thank you -- that's good to hear.
> Only have regular SCSI disks (LVD) connected to this box.
> Attached is /proc/scsi/scsi output.
> And "smartctl -a" output for 8 (or 9) disks with "smartctl -V".
> BTW, running "cvs up" updated two files relative to ia64 sm5 test:
> grundler@gsyprf11:/usr/src/sm5$ cvs update
> P atacmds.c
> P scsicmds.c
Ahh, this is why I wanted the output of "-V". Unfortunately sourceforge's
cvs pserver is one to three days out-of-date.
> And I wasn't comfortable running on any of the "smartctl -t" on this
> box. It looks like most of the disks are in use.
In fact if you can run the -t tests; these use background disk cycles when
they are not loaded, and won't interfere with the OS. Just DON'T use the
"-C" (captive) option. This WILL interfere with the users/OS.