On Lu, 17 iun 13, 17:17:22, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On 2013-05-21 18:37, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >> Any plans to move it to git?
>
> This position holds for Jessie IMHO but by then it's probably time to
> take care of it for the reason Helge stated, offline work.
>
> > And that's no longer "bubulle is resisting new technology" thing.
> > Most of my packages are now managed with git and I really see the
> > benefit of it.
>
> AOL!
> I have no problem to work with git, svn, mercurial or whatever.
> Aligning stuff is just a matter of the backend people, the translation
> teams ("team" in some/my case) will mostly adopt. And given a timely
> manner good tutorials can be brought to attention to the translators
> (yes, I'll help with that give a reasonable time frame).
I admit my question was quite selfish. In order to keep things as
consistent as possible I try to use git everywhere, mostly because it
can work offline and it is quite fast.
For SVN repositories I use git-svn, which means that updating my
checkout takes a lot of time.
I have also seen a general tendency of migrating away from SVN (most of
the times to git) and I think it would be a good idea to have this in
mind. Otherwise we may end up like the webwml repository, the last one
to use cvs and which DSA is stuck supporting because the translation
infrastructure is cvs-specific.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature