Re: D-I localization : the game resumed...

[Martin Bagge / brother <brother@bsnet.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-05-21 18:37, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> Any plans to move it to git?
> Besides not having time for that and even more not having time for 
> teaching translators the new processes?
> 
> Honestly, I don't really see the benefit for something that
> basically no reason to undergo some complicated branching and
> stuff.

I've been torn in this question. Why stay with svn? Wy move to git?
There is only a huge a gray area here. Svn will continue to be a
working and good solution for years to come. Git doesn't really enable
that much magic in this particular use case (doing translations).

> If it isn't broken, why fix it?

This position holds for Jessie IMHO but by then it's probably time to
take care of it for the reason Helge stated, offline work.

> And that's no longer "bubulle is resisting new technology" thing.
> Most of my packages are now managed with git and I really see the
> benefit of it.

AOL!
I have no problem to work with git, svn, mercurial or whatever.
Aligning stuff is just a matter of the backend people, the translation
teams ("team" in some/my case) will mostly adopt. And given a timely
manner good tutorials can be brought to attention to the translators
(yes, I'll help with that give a reasonable time frame).

- -- 
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRvyiCAAoJEJbdSEaj0jV7PQ4IAKuOHEloO0fd7y+vhYQqBCco
qayzFZLRjUgQuN/LK4CVE476i0xFpWWHI8sHlpTaMM3q4I+iEv2dL20PImxLZGrj
lVX15TJr0W3PDVFDDPbojxIfvF4Khk9/Qc5ijxbV6T3JtCtbv0TBtj/M0bmpmYZZ
PmJO+OA/0aProMhXGF2W8FsCZzh4EZKpgnZLU0Lw+83zQIRR6Y46FulZqm4tzBxC
Zd8KA3CfJC/gE8DYQ/SftsPWP2opWFiHO/jHANj9amjo7AnvjufGsx0Y5HQJcf6Y
m2S7HuPJ9t7UeQh32S7hi5qZt4x0idp1oQcFUeAQKJFJHQRVdJs/uqgP5HvoMKg=
=AYEx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----