Re: [Debian-l10n-devel] DDTP new machine update
- To: debian-admin@lists.debian.org, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>, Debian L10N Development <debian-l10n-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Debian I18n <debian-i18n@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [Debian-l10n-devel] DDTP new machine update
- From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:14:05 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] CADWG95tKF1qUEnpKUWZHd57GVUcBOfKLT=C8ihOJ3=VVX7zwbQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <CADWG95vORcq6n0HHb-OLOXEgi0Qj-pngTrUHV0bZNx1pS855Ng@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADWG95uc5vWwmXkq_UPJ0xF8eHqehBs_upuD255ukmmX5_fW-A@mail.gmail.com> <20120715153525.GB4776@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20120717183855.GB3845@varinia.lobefin.net> <CADWG95uixuR4xxOdUhaa-gq3XpvqJ3O5-3m_-Giped65ahoaNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGdvKqg6uJe1Nf-s1SoOK1BWHS6xNy1HzZbQYNNmYo8Lvp3erg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207181024430.13139@salyut.bsnet.se> <CAGdvKqhVv3xW-HYF1pbbo_Dz4fhbdAq2oa5zUcH7MYbFqniRug@mail.gmail.com> <20120718133340.GQ4776@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20120719084043.GL31551@anguilla.noreply.org> <20120719132840.GH4776@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20120719134016.GO31551@anguilla.noreply.org> <CADWG95vORcq6n0HHb-OLOXEgi0Qj-pngTrUHV0bZNx1pS855Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 19 July 2012 19:58, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2012 3:40 PM, "Peter Palfrader" <weasel@debian.org> wrote:
>> Not you personally, y'all :)
>>
>> | 2012-07-13 20:27:43 UTC ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique
>> constraint "package_tb_3_idx"
>> | 2012-07-13 20:27:43 UTC DETAIL: Key (package, version)=(2vcard, 0.5-3)
>> already exists.
>> | 2012-07-13 20:27:43 UTC STATEMENT: INSERT INTO packages_tb
>> (package,source,version,tag,priority,maintainer,task,section,description,description_md5)
>> | VALUES
>> ($1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10);
>>
>> We got a couple million like this before the filesystem ran full.
>
> Ah, sorry about that, that's the ddtp import script. I know it's not
> fabulously written, that's why I wrote a replacement which is faster and
> does't produce such errors.
The new import script has been running for a few days. Can you confirm
we're not causing any more problems? We're happy to deal with any
issues you may still have.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/
Reply to: