[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Reminder for gom translation updates (take two)



Hi,

Le 01/09/2012 01:34, Christian PERRIER a écrit :

> Hmmm, I seem to recognize this harsh style..:-)

I must admit I learned it from the best… The recipe is simple: just
arrive at the end of the battle, add a few details, mimic and copy what
the master do for years (including the same boilerplates), and make some
noise around it: you can get all the credit! I can even prove it:

> Thanks for all your work about all these little corners of dust we had
> in our i18n infrastructure. The 100% we'll achieve will be a much
> better 100% because of your work..:-)

Well, thanks for your thanks, but thank *you* for your longstanding
efforts, allowing us to reach that point now, so the only room for
improvement is to dig up some remaining nip-tickings issues.

Since it seems to works, let me continue:

(yesterday's reminder was sent in advance on purpose to be 100% sure
that languages targeting 100% in wheezy wouldn't be late. Now that
this is achieved, here is the real reminder. Please note that I really
intend to upload gom tomorrow morning, so you need to hurry if you're late)

This is a reminder for the running translation round for debconf
templates of gom.

Currently complete languages:
 da de es eu fr it nl pl pt ru sv sk

Currently existing but incomplete languages:
 cs gl ja pt_BR ro ta

Please send out updates *now*.

On Sunday, September 2, 2012, I will upload a new package version.

So, if you have something being worked on, please send it as
soon as possible.

Please contact me privately if you want to obtain the PO file for
incomplete languages. The POT file can be obtained from the list
archives.

There is always a chance that a translation you or your team sent
slipped through my mail and spam filters. If you indeed send an update
as a bug report and your language is still listed here, please point
me to the bug number.

Regards

David


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: