[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: postfixadmin 2.3.5-1: Please translate debconf PO for the package postfixadmin

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:11:40AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 11/04/2012 05:06, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
> > I would like to ask everyone involved - maintainers and translators
> > alike - to not do that: don't request bugs to be filed against packages
> > not yet in the archive, and preferably don't file bugs against such
> > stuff. Send translations to the maintainer directly instead, or get the
> > package in the archive first - whatever works for you, but what happend
> > here is a tiny bit annoying for everyone involved.
> Sure, it's pretty rare that maintainers care enough for translations to
> ask for them before the package actually enters the Debian archive, I
> would like to first thank Norman for that. In such case, we should
> indeed care to handle the bugs properly, but asking translators to *not*
> fill bug report is a bit tough. Those bugs report are quite easy to find:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=postfixadmin;dist=unstable
> and they are really useful for the coordination:
> http://i18n.debian.net/debian-l10n/french/fr.by_package.html#postfixadmin

Full seconed. I am also quite happy that here all users of Debian are
considered from the start, not only those which happen to speak
English fluently (as Debconf questions are shown only once, this *is*


      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: