[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU scuttle to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Hi Christian,

On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 06:58 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal@debian.org):
> > > Would you mind if I launch a call for translation updates so that you
> > > can upload with a few more translations?
> > 
> > Sounds good for me against SemanticScuttle, because Scuttle will be
> > removed from Debian repository.
> In the meantime (I mean while scuttle is still in the archive), is
> there a problem if I send an NMU with the pending translations? That
> would move the package out of the l10n radar and conclude this action,
> from my point of view.

Ok! Go a head, fix it.

> Alternatively, if scuttle is really meant to be removed from the
> archive, is there already a bug report requesting this?

Not yet, we didn't plan how replace Scuttle with SemanticScuttle =/


Marcelo Jorge Vieira

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: