[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU scuttle to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



Quoting Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal@debian.org):

> > Would you mind if I launch a call for translation updates so that you
> > can upload with a few more translations?
> 
> Sounds good for me against SemanticScuttle, because Scuttle will be
> removed from Debian repository.


In the meantime (I mean while scuttle is still in the archive), is
there a problem if I send an NMU with the pending translations? That
would move the package out of the l10n radar and conclude this action,
from my point of view.

Alternatively, if scuttle is really meant to be removed from the
archive, is there already a bug report requesting this?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: