[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of vpb-driver to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



Quoting Ron (ron@debian.org):

> I don't currently have any other reason pending for a new release of this
> package, except this bug.  And I haven't forgotten about that one either,
> I'd just been waiting for another reason to upload, or maybe a few more
> translations to bubble in to do them all in a batch.
> 
> Since I'm also upstream for this, I'm happy to push out a new update for
> it if we're moving toward "finalise things ready for the freeze" mode.
> 
> Would you perhaps like to put out another call for translations on this
> one first?  So that if there are any more to come we can do them all in
> the one upload.  If so, let me know what timeline you want to give that
> and I'll upload whatever we've got at the end of that period.
> 
> I'm sort of trying to avoid releasing "one new version for every new
> translation" -- because that makes users wonder if they need to update
> too when they mostly probably don't, but I'm also happy to have the most
> complete set of translations that we can for wheezy, so if we can shake
> out any more that are likely to come before I do the the next upload,
> that would be great!


I just sent a call for translations. It should bring one or two more
translations, according to the activity I've recently witnessed from
l10n teams.

Then, I'll send you a summary and of course leave priority to you for
an upload as I always do in such cases.

Many thanks for your quick answer.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: