[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to NMU slbackup to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs



Quoting Morten Werner Forsbring (werner@forsbring.no):

> > If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package
> > alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now.
> 
> What's the best for you? If it's just updated debconf translations for
> russian (#569574) and spanish (#578034), I can upload later today? If
> there is more updates that you would like to include, I have no problems
> with you NMUing it. :)

My proposal is in the middle of this: as usual when I'm doing an l10n
NMU, I send a call for translations to give translators an opportunity
to send new translations. Sometimes, one or two flow in...sometimes
none does. That call for translations lasts for one week. Then, I
upload the NMU.

However, the important thing for me is an upload to happen, and a
maintainer upload is much better, of course. 

So, what I propose in such cases, where the maintainer is responsive
(some aren't): I send a call for translations, I gather and check what
is eventually coming in and, after one week, I send you a summary that
sounds like a "go for upload". Would that be OK for you?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: