Re: Intent to NMU jazip to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs
Christian Perrier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith (email@example.com):
> > Christian Perrier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > Dear Debian maintainer,
> > >
> > > The jazip Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> > > pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> > > for po-debconf, namely bug number 416777 (and maybe other similar bugs).
> > Oui, il y en a un autre aussi.
> > Thanks for the heads-up. I will try to make an upload this week.
> > Adding a translation is an easy upload, so I have no excuse for not
> > having done it already. Sorry to waste your time like this.
> As the remainder of the mail says, if you plan an upload, then let's
> plan a call for translations.
> My proposal: I send a call for translations, with the usual 8 days
> delay I use during this NMU campaign.
> When the delay is over, I send you a patch with all changes.
> Please also note that jazip can get several improvements mentioned by
> * [Lintian] Use correct menu section: Applications/System/Administration
> * [Lintian] Use correct copyright line in debian/copyright
> * [Lintian] Remove old debmake cruft in README.Debian
> * [Lintian] Set debhelper compatibility level in debian/compat
> * [Lintian] Upgrade debhelper compatibility level to 4
> * [Lintian] No longer ignore errors from "make clean"
Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer <email@example.com>
GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E