Quoting Rafael Laboissiere (rafael@debian.org):
> Indeed, "ça ne fera pas de mal". However, I think that fixing atlas is much
> more important than fixing atlas3, since the later will probably disappear
> in the future (perhaps post-lenny, although it is already useless today).
>
> In sum, go ahead and fix atlas3, if you see fit. However, please consider
> fixing atlas, too.
I'm preparing the NMU. I'll send my standard "note" to atlas@p.d.o but
will also ask on -release.
Question about your patch:
* Add new debconf translations:
+ Japanese, thanks TANAKA Atushi (closes: #414375)
+ Spanish, thanks Felipe Caminos (closes: #414940)
+ Finnidh, thanks Esko Arajärvi (closes: #469545)
* Update Vietnamese debconf translation, thanks Clytie Siddall
(closes: #426974)
These bugs are atlas3 bugs, not atlas bugs. So, they should be closed
with atlas3. Of course, we can still mention we added those
translations as well.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature