debconf PO translations for the package flex

[Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>]

Hi,

The debian-l10n-english team has reviewed the debconf templates for
flex. This opens an opportunity for new translations to be sent
for that package.

flex already includes translations for:
cs da de es fr lt nl pt ru sv vi

so do not translate it to these languages (the previous translators will
be contacted separately).

language        translated     fuzzy     untranslated
-----------------------------------------------------
  cs                 2           1
  da                 2           1
  de                 2           1
  es                 2           1
  fr                 3
  lt                 2           1
  nl                 2           1
  pt                 2           1
  ru                 2           1
  sv                 2           1
  vi                 2           1

Please send the updated file as a wishlist bug
against the package.

The deadline for receiving the updated translation is Tuesday, November 13, 2007.

If you have read this far, please see the attached POT file.

Thanks,

# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
# FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
#
#, fuzzy
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: srivasta@debian.org\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2007-10-30 07:26+0100\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../templates.master:2001
msgid "Are you sure you want to upgrade flex?"
msgstr ""

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../templates.master:2001
msgid ""
"The behavior of Flex has undergone a major change since version 2.5.4a. Flex "
"scanners are now reentrant: they can have multiple scanners in the same "
"program with differing sets of defaults, and they play nicer with modern C "
"and C++ compilers. The flipside is that Flex no longer conforms to the POSIX "
"lex behavior, and the scanners require conforming implementations when Flex "
"is used in ANSI C mode. The package flex-old provides the older behavior."
msgstr ""

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../templates.master:2001
msgid ""
"Please make sure you are prepared for these changes in Flex before "
"continuing with its upgrade."
msgstr ""