> It's required by ion3's upstream author. Don't ask. Yep. Don't ask. Also don't read the various links that lead to the upstream author's braindead views on how free software development and cooperation should happen. Basically, the crappy license of this product is: -the product should not be called "ion" if patched -the product should not be called "ion" if not shipping the latest stable release of the software without giving prominent warnings to users that it is not supported by the Upstream Author (capitals are intentional). All this is, imho, braindead. This indeed explains why ion3 is now non-free. I should have spent much much less time on this package, indeed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature