On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:33, JC Helary wrote: > > It's more than that; that's what the constitution refers to Debian > > Developers as, so the NM process needs to use the same terminology. > > Yes, the constitution refers to Developers as being _Project Members_. > (article 5.1.2) You are repeating yourself in a very annoying way. Also, you are making a grave interpretation error here: that the term "member" is used _once_ in the constitution in a descriptive way does not allow you to conclude that the terms are synonymous. The only official term _is_ Debian Developer as used throughout the rest of the constitution. Please stop this "member" nonsense, you are rapidly starting to become a troll. Any points that you have wanted to make were clear about 6 mails ago. The rest is repetition. Please accept that the consensus is against you and move on.
Attachment:
pgpPuE2YBHINH.pgp
Description: PGP signature