Re: Work on a centralized infrastructure for i18n/l10n
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/29/2005 07:32 PM, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 29/12/2005 alle 21.30 +0100, Daniel Nylander ha scritto:
>>>On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:15:20PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>That's one of the reasons why, for example, the initial DDTP project did
>>>>not
>>>
>>>no, this is/was not the reasons of the problem of ddtp.
>>>The problem was the problemes with gluck and the mail server on gluck.
>>
>>So this means that DDTP can be resurrected?
>>
>>Daniel
>
> Should be as it was only a technical problem. The code is avaliable on
> alioth.
>
> Bye
> Stefano
After "the compromise of Debian Servers", DDTP stops for a while.
Then it was resurrected and we start working on that again. After a couple
of thread we discover that some teams had given up of DDTP since there are
no support for it in apt tools.
Recently a group of people start working to check the DDTP code
(to be sure that there are no trojan horses on it because of the compromise),
it became the Alioth Project, the idea is also bring more people to DDTP
development to get better responses.
As far as I remember, some apt tools got the feature to query
translated descriptions and "grisu" also [1]exchange some ideas in -i18n
about a "new DDTP" with more features and maybe using pseudo-urls.
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2005/07/msg00060.html
Last time I saw, Otavio and grisu are involved with the new
DDTP system (both are cc'ed), and maybe Margarita was working on it too,
I'm not sure. Anyway, as I said before, should be a good idea to get
DDTP integrated in the new framework. :))
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDtF7wCjAO0JDlykYRAtlvAKCnCAaWtgJ2QLY4MeCgqTwwUXWV0gCeJyul
623E9obtNbxw6chqV+cIrDw=
=jcfD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: