Re: l10n infrastructure: using a big DB instead of packages?
- To: debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: l10n infrastructure: using a big DB instead of packages?
- From: Martin Quinson <mquinson@ens-lyon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 21:53:17 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040706045317.GC1590@sport750>
- In-reply-to: <40C88F3E.6050906@kadath.com.ar>
- References: <20040604052315.GL3999@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <uusy8n35j0w.fsf@GENUINE-IMITATION-OVALKWIK.MIT.EDU> <20040604213255.GA32216@nikolai.prokoschenko.pc> <20040607052715.GC12674@manitee.cs.ucsb.edu> <40C88F3E.6050906@kadath.com.ar>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 01:41:34PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> Martin Quinson wrote, On 06/07/2004 02:27 AM:
>
> >[...]
> >is not to dig in the package paradigm. It's to implement a download
> >solution
> >featuring rsync or diff mecanisms. What will you do when people will start
> >[...]
>
> Do you know if somebody is working on this (the rsync method to get
> package upgrades)? Sounds useful behond translations and worth giving it
> a try.
[Sorry for the delay, a crash disk...]
Well, I would swear I read something on that, but I cannot find where again.
Try to ask on -deity if they know something about that.
Sorry, Mt.
--
La drogue était un milieu plutot sain avant que le sport ne s'en mêle.
Reply to: