Re: Language aggregation in www.d.o/intl/l10n
Sorry, I have a stupid question here: are you portuguese speaker yourself ?
I am not, but I've seen several times peoples from both pt and pt_BR team
asking for clearly separate the two languages, because they DO differ (IIRC).
So, I cannot say myself that such change is wrong, but I would like to hear
from those lists before going further on that way.
That's why I CCed their ML to have their advice.
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 01:21:07AM +0100, Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> Is it possible to have language aggregation in ?
> For example, pt_PT has only 8 files. It would be great if were possible
> to rename them to pt.po, but Abiword, horde2, imp3, turba, mnemo and
> squirrelmail all use only xx_XX format, so it would be difficult to ask
> upstream to rename them.
> Everybuddy and gtkam have xx_XX as well as xx languages, so I'm about to
> send bugreports to maintainers, as well as updated .po files, asking
> them to rename those files and to ask upstream to do the same.
> Having agregation between xy and xy_XY languages would trully show those
> language status, not just for Portuguese, but I guess to other languages
> as well.
> Debconf templates  and debconf gettext  both have it right .
> Was this already discussed somewhere ? (I didn't find anything in a
> quick look)
> Is it possible ? It would help alot my soon-to-be project for Portuguese
> translations :)
>  http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/
>  http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/templates/
>  http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/
>  except for one debconf template for hu_HU, but debconf templating is
> to be replaced for gettext and it will be fixed then, I'm sure
> Bruno Rodrigues <email@example.com>
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a
Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and
explode once every few weeks, killing everyone inside.