[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?



On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: netdde
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package
> from
> unstable, because:
> 
>   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
>     but wasn't part of stretch
> AND
>   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
>     but it wasn't part of jessie
> AND
>   it is still not in testing
> AND
>   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
> 
> If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> free to just close this bug.
> 
> If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be
> turned
> into a removal request, using:
> 
>   reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
>   retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
>   thanks
> 
> - Lucas, for the QA team.
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
> 

The same applies as for bug #870985. It is currently used for hurd-i386 only,
but is essential for that architecture. Please close this bug too.


Reply to: