[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#870981: marked as done (netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2017 12:28:52 -0400
with message-id <20170806162852.hpshgltvttk7ugxd@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#870981: netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
has caused the Debian Bug report #870981,
regarding netdde: should netdde be removed from unstable?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
870981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: netdde
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch

Hi,

Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:

  it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
    but wasn't part of stretch
AND
  it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
    but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
  it is still not in testing
AND
  it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.

If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:

  reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
  retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
  thanks

- Lucas, for the QA team.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 06/08/17 at 18:16 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 09:50 -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: netdde
> > User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> > missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package
> > from
> > unstable, because:
> > 
> >   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
> >     but wasn't part of stretch
> > AND
> >   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
> >     but it wasn't part of jessie
> > AND
> >   it is still not in testing
> > AND
> >   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.
> > 
> > If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> > free to just close this bug.
> > 
> > If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be
> > turned
> > into a removal request, using:
> > 
> >   reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
> >   retitle -1 RM: netdde -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
> >   thanks
> > 
> > - Lucas, for the QA team.
> > 
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html
> > 
> 
> The same applies as for bug #870985. It is currently used for hurd-i386 only,
> but is essential for that architecture. Please close this bug too.

Done, but you know you can do it, too? :-)

OTOH, with Hurd living on debian-ports, shouldn't hurd-specific packages
live only on debian-ports too?

Lucas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: