Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?

[Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>]

Hi,

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 09:50:12AM -0400, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: hurd-libfuse
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
> missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
> unstable, because:
> 
>   it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
>     but wasn't part of stretch
> AND
>   it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
>     but it wasn't part of jessie
> AND
>   it is still not in testing

Well, it's hurd-i386 only, which doesn't have testing, so the three
above don't apply really.

> AND
>   it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

That might be the case, but that alone shouldn't be grounds for removal.
 
> If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
> free to just close this bug.

Will do so in a bit unless you complain.


Michael