Bug#870985: hurd-libfuse: should hurd-libfuse be removed from unstable?

[Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>]

Source: hurd-libfuse
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-removals-post-stretch

Hi,

Following a discussion[1] on the debian-qa@ mailing list on packages that
missed both jessie and stretch, I am proposing the removal of this package from
unstable, because:

  it was in unstable at the time of the stretch freeze
    but wasn't part of stretch
AND
  it was in unstable at the time of the jessie freeze
    but it wasn't part of jessie
AND
  it is still not in testing
AND
  it was not uploaded since the beginning of 2017.

If you disagree and think that this package should remain in unstable, feel
free to just close this bug.

If this bug is still open one month from now (on 2017-09-06), it will be turned
into a removal request, using:

  reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
  retitle -1 RM: hurd-libfuse -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch
  thanks

- Lucas, for the QA team.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2017/07/msg00021.html