Re: Hurd and the archive
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
> On 06/05/13 20:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Adding it and then keeping it out of the usual migration rules is asking
> > for failure from the beginning, accumulating cruft. Not a way to go, IMO.
>
> In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
> away by its inclusion?
I would rather say simply dropping them, as already requested in
Bug#704477. And as I said a fair amount of these are actually already
submitted as general FTBFS bugs or "upgrade libtool" bugs.
> There is a lot of overlap though, e.g. fixing a kfreebsd build failure
> may fix hurd-i386.
Yes, there are a lot of these. Funniest cases are for instance "that's
not linux? Oh, that must be windows, let's include windows.h"...
Samuel
Reply to: