Re: Is the debian-doc kfreeBSD-ready?
El 11 d’abril de 2012 14:26, Nicolas Barbier
<nicolas.barbier@gmail.com> ha escrit:
> FWIW, I have never heard anyone use the term “kFreeBSD” in a
> non-Debian context; therefore I find it strange to use it at such an
> introductory location.
>
> What about using “kernel of FreeBSD” and indicating that the
> abbreviation for that is “kFreeBSD”? E.g.:
>
> “Debian can use either Linux or the kernel of FreeBSD (called
> kFreeBSD) at its core”
I agree. However, the "called" makes it look like we're an
authoritative source (and officially, the kernel of FreeBSD doesn't
have a name of its own).
How about something like:
[...] or the kernel of FreeBSD (often referred to as "kFreeBSD") as its core.
--
Robert Millan
Reply to: