Alle venerdì 5 ottobre 2012, Svante Signell ha scritto: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 13:59 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Alle venerdì 5 ottobre 2012, Svante Signell ha scritto: > > > Follow-up questions: > > > 1) What to do about the Debian bug #599789 > > > - upload an updated (rediffed) hurd.patch? > > > - upload the .debian.tar.gz and the .dsc file? > > > - do nothing? > > > > or, even better: > > - forward it upstream, which I did earlier, since you apparently > > care more having things in debian-ports than having them fixed > > properly upstream > > Good idea, maybe you might do that, you are the bug submitter. ... that's why above I wrote "which I did earlier". > Regarding debian-ports I'm > interested in what the percentage would be when all bugs having > patches are applied, because the working packages triggers new build > problems on depending ones. (however not for premake, which is a > leaf package). If we are in the main archive, debian-ports must not be used *at all*. Having new libraries in debian-ports won't change a bit the percentage of packages built in the main archive. > > Also, the patch in #599789 applies fine, when the end line is set > > to CRLF (somehow it got converted while sending... wtf). > > I finally found that out. Why should one use CRLF nowadays? Because it's what the patched sources were using. -- Pino Toscano
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.