Re: Architecture qualification
Joerg Jaspert, le Tue 29 May 2012 09:02:32 +0200, a écrit :
> There is only one thing I would agree on: If the RT decides to not
> include them in wheezy but add them to wheezy+1 right after wheezy is
> released (so we would be doing it during the process) and keep them
> there for the next release, then fine. Thats not exactly what we agreed
> on, but would be a workable compromise.
I believe that'd be fine from the Hurd part. I personnally don't want
to add work on people by hurrying hurd-i386 into wheezy.
> - hurd is no longer on the main mirrors. But "only" on those carrying
I don't think it's a problem indeed.
What is a problem is not appearing on buildd.debian.org. That makes
maintainers way less receptive to patches or even fix their package