Re: Packages remaining at debian-ports
Svante Signell, le Thu 26 Jan 2012 18:18:30 +0100, a écrit :
> binutils: #629866
> gcc-4.4: see binutils, #629866
> gcc-4.6: see binutils, #629866
This still needs to be worked on, but we can probably release without.
> cardmgr-gnumach: Move to Hurd or obsolete?
> gopherfs: Move to Hurdextras?
> netio: move to Hurd?
> random-egd: obsolete?
> wireless-tools-gnumach: Move to Hurd/obsolete?
> tarfs: move to Hurdextras, to package!
I'd say just keep them as such until we get to fix them if needed and add
> console-driver-xkb: Move to Hurd?
Ideally, yes, but see the mailing list: there were some concerns with
the code there, which weren't addressed.
> x gch6, still unsolved!
Yes, unfortunately. That would bring us quite a few packages.
> grub2: decide on partition sizes,
> - parted: #649741 + decide on partition sizes
As said, we need to decide on this.
> - guile-1.8: #646544 (guile-2.0 in experimental, #630415)
> - hyperestraier: #558586
> - icon: #654386
> - mx: #648187
> - qdbm: #648663, #648649
> - webkit: #649192
> - ruby-1.9.1: #648055
> - pulseaudio: SA_NOCLDWAIT, #573339
In principle we can just wait.
> hdf5: ports: 1.8.4-5, sid:1.8.8-5: remove
Yes, that can be removed now.
> ifupdown: TODO/obsolete?
It's part of whether we are fine with the current network startup (which
does not play well with dhcp), or we really support ifupdown.
> - isc-dhcp: #616290
See the recent thread: we probably need to discuss directly with upstream.
> libdrm: ports: 2.4.23-1, sid: 2.4.29-1 (not for us)
> libusb: ports: 0.1.12-13, sid: 0.1.12-20 (not for us)
This *needs* to be worked on.
> x- lockdev: ports: 1.0.3-1.4+hurd.1, sid: #(soon reported bug)
> x sane-backend-extras: # TODO, WIP!
> screen: ports: 4.0.3-14+hurd.1 (remove?), sid: 4.0.3-14
No removal! the sid package is still buggy! We'll probably NMU it if
nothing happens before the freeze.
> sudo: ports: 1.8.3-2 sid: 1.8.3-3: FTBFS: build-dep on libselinux1-dev
Indeed, we need to ask the maintainer for making the dep linux-any.