Re: Bug#611456: Why wishlist?
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> It fixes a FTBFS bug though, which makes "important" a reasonable
> severity for this.
It fails to build from source on an architecture it never claimed to
support in the first place...
> However, we respect your opinion about this being "wishlist" for now and
> will likely ship the x86info package in a seperate repository for your
> users until the patch is acceptable for inclusion according to your
> standards.
When I said I hadn't rejected the patch that's exactly what I meant. If
I had no intention at all of applying the patch I'd just have closed the
report.
Reply to: