On Saturday 12 February 2011 11:04:56 olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote: > > I think we should revisit their old list of requirements and see how > > we do, prepare a report on that and ask them what else we should do > > now. Is that doable in an hour? If yes, could you post the link to the requirements? > Either way, a (kinda) quick reaction was good IMHO. It doesn't preclude > a more sophisticated argument later on... I think so, too. Nothing is worse than inactivity, knowing the (false) reputation of the Hurd. Best wishes, Arne
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.