Re: any objections from port maintainers to make gcc-4.4 the default?
Matthias Klose, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 00:39:52 +0200, a écrit :
> On 20.09.2009 22:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Matthias Klose, le Sun 20 Sep 2009 19:58:22 +0200, a écrit :
> >>I'm not sure about Java, which show some regressions compared to 4.3. Otoh
> >>it's not amymore the default java compiler for all architectures except
> >I haven't explicitely tested but I don't know any issue with gcj-4.4 on
> >hurd-i386, what should I test for instance?
> A comparision of testsuite results (4.3/4.4) would be good.
Sorry it took long to do them. 2 buildds on 3 are currently down so I
didn't spend one on it. There is no testsuite regression between 4.3 and 4.4.
> I don't see build logs posted.
They used to be only on www.buildd.net. Since recently they are now
also available on buildd.debian.org.
> Then try to build packages natively (ecj, gjdoc), etc.
Being compiled etc.