Scribit Marco Gerards dies 16/03/2005 hora 20:06: > May I ask you why you care that much about the FHS? As an admin, I found it useful. Like many other standards, it avoids that every single projet deal common problems in a way that is incompatible with others (or just different, as far as learning them is concerned). For people working on different UNIX-like systems, and with the FHS, one only have to know the FHS organization, instead of haivng to learn zillions of FS structures. > I almost hate the FHS because of all those useless discussions about > it on the Hurd mailinglists. If it's a frequenty asked question, why about putting a complete and clean answser in the Hurd's FAQ, with pros and cons? > Sometimes I wonder why people don't hack instead of discussing things > forever. I learned that discussing before acting is an intelligent way of doing things. It's not an excuse to waste energy in never-ending discussions, but just acting is not always A Good Thing. Before coding, I like to build specifications of my future work, for example. > Is it *REALLY* that important if there are two extra directories on > GNU/Hurd? It would just be very comfortable to newcomers in Hurd if things were in standard places they have already learned about. > How about /sys in GNU/Linux, etc? Did someone on this list meant that /sys was a good thing, or was FHS-compliant? Quickly, Nowhere man -- nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature