Re: problems with inetutils-inetd
Guillem Jover wrote:
One part of the patch that fixes this was not included in last release,
because it required C99. Jeff is looking into this now. So expect next
release of dpkg to be fixed (or at least hope so :).
Another thing in the patch that is not included is walking through all
pids in function-constructor. I don't know why constructor is needed,
but declaring it as such helps.
I've just reopened the bug (with originator firstname.lastname@example.org) because
it's not fixed -- these issues are not solved.
I've uploaded dpkg 1.10.22 with those rejected changes in