Re: FTBFS: perl
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 04:42:30PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Still, there are 19 tests which fail even when threads are disabled.
> > These are the build log and the patch I used to disable threads:
>
> The only ones I'd take any time exploring are the ndbm tests. I would
> be worried about it produce bad databases or corrupting them. (There
> isn't enough here to see what the failures are). It might also be nice
> to look at the math errors. The other things (socket errors, pipe
> errors, and such) are all ignorable.
Interesting. Do these ignorable bugs mean bugs in the Hurd or something?
> I'm hoping that glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 will be suitable for hurd-i386 again,
> which includes a CVS update. Mostly it's now waiting on me getting a
> working cross compiler.
What do you mean, exactly? That you do not consider native compiling
reliable? That you do not consider native compiling reliable for glibc
specifically? That glibc does not allow native compiling now? That
glibc needs gcc 3.4? :-)
Reply to: