Re: mouse device
- To: Johannes Rohr <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: mouse device
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:21:30 +0200
- Message-id: <20030711132130.GA620@126.96.36.199>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <5F2G.27T.firstname.lastname@example.org> <5Hxs.41D.email@example.com> <5Xsw.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 08:17:13AM +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 12:43:50AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > btw, you upstream CVS people could please commit the mouse/kbd patch
> > > from the debian hurd_*.diff.gz?
> > No, it's just a horrid hack.
> Then, why is it there at all? X doesn't really need it. It works fine
> with its own drivers.
I don't think so. It used to be quite sluggish to use X's drivers.
Can you confirm that performance is the same, and that all types supported
by the mouse device are supported by X's drivers? PS/2?
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org firstname.lastname@example.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/