Re: libexec in glibc
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> We need not change anything now in Hurd systems. We do not need to
> worry about matching aspects of policy that we expect to change by
> the time we actually release. And, we expect that FHS will have, by
> that time, a Hurd-specific annex that covers this particular point.
I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a
Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to
accept if we were storing anything other than Hurd-specific binaries
in there), so I'd like to understand more.
learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
- Wolfgang Jaehrling