[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libexec in glibc

On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:37:22PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:

> We need not change anything now in Hurd systems.  We do not need to
> worry about matching aspects of policy that we expect to change by
> the time we actually release.  And, we expect that FHS will have, by
> that time, a Hurd-specific annex that covers this particular point.

I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you
remind me what mailing list it was on?  The idea of libexec being in a
Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to
accept if we were storing anything other than Hurd-specific binaries
in there), so I'd like to understand more.

Jeff Bailey

learning from failures is nice in theory...
but in practice, it sucks :)
 - Wolfgang Jaehrling

Reply to: