Re: Building gcc 2.95.4 natively?
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I don't know about iputils, but oskit might have problems with new gcc
> because of the somewhat older Linux driver code that it includes..
Both fail to build with errors that seem "strange" to me. That is, not
your run-of-the-mill won't-compile porting-required errors. So I
agree that it may be related to the new gcc. That's why I was hoping
for a "mature" version of gcc so I could give them another try :^)
> You should have included the info here.
NP, Marcus, here it is. Please read this link for the gory details on
The oskit bug report is here:
The iputils bug report is here:
> In any case, it is quite likely that we don't support gcc 2.95.x at all
> anymore, for example in our glibc (although that might only affect C++)
Are there known programs/packages that don't build with the 3.x
generation of gcc? If so, I'm glad I'm not a package maintainer!