Re: permissions. ACLs? groups?
Sorry for late answer.
Jaap Karssenberg <email@example.com> writes:
> The following might very well be absurd, I was daydreaming.
> When one allows users to create new groups within their own name space,
> wouldn't a logical next step to be to let users create their own users within
> their own name space (and within their own "permission space").
Wasn't this implemented like this on Digitals large machines (PDP-10