Re: porting nethack-3.4.0 to the Hurd: partial results
--- PUYDT Julien <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I have done something more than modifying my patch (and you'll easily
> understand why I do not give a patch for that): I butchered the
> debian/rules to be able to build the packages without qt. This, with
> some magic symlinking of X libs to /lib, made it possible to _test_ the
> execs. And I can now tell you:
This would of couse be the wrong(tm) solution. Eventually we are hoping to
the get X11 libs into /lib, but for now you should set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
include /lib/X11R6 and /local/lib
> - nethack-x11 works;
> - I still suck at nethack;
> - nethack-gnome works;
> - I'm not better with the gnome variant.
> Thanks again to Wolfgang!
> Snark on #hurd, #hurdfr
May I add your nick and email to the hurd irc list?
University of Waterloo
Computer Science - Digital Hardware
Anyone referring to this as 'Open Source' shall be eaten by a GNU
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org