Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
Le lun 20/05/2002 à 02:41, Wolfgang Jährling a écrit :
> > Now, for some other analogies, to existing practices, showing that /hurd is
> > not needed, *at all*.
> Of course it is not needed. Just as there is no need for /bin. Or /lib.
> Or /home. You can put everything in one directory. And with the Shadowfs
> translator you could actually kind of do this if you like. ;-)
or simply remove directories, and use DOS 1.0 ;)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org