Re: where do NEW packages go?
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 01:27:07AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Having /hurd has nothing to do with FHS. You can have FHS, as well
> > as having /hurd.
> Software should never create or require special files or
> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package.
> -- FHS
Perhaps extra flexibility should be granted to ports that don't yet have
an operating-system-specific annex.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com