Re: Hurd TWiki trial - Announcement
firstname.lastname@example.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
> * Robert Millan writes:
> > very interesting. you mean like, *fs, proc and auth will be treated as
> > separate components of the system? maybe there could be a package for
> > each, so they can be handled/upgraded separately. does that technicaly
> > make sense?
> They are already separate components of the system. The official
> Hurd package will contain the "official" versions of each such
> translator. A user may write their own replacement for such
> translators. I think it would be quite annoying to have to upgrade
> each translator manually like that.
I think it would be not a bad idea to ship them as separate
packages. This way one could install a 'replacement' pacakge for any
of them. And for ease of upgrade: There does nothing speak against a
hurd meta-package IMHO...
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | email@example.com
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com