[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Developers who write Debian GNU/Linux when they mean Debian.



On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Brian May wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:05:57AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I usually prefer just "... for the Debian system". "Debian/GNU" reads
> > awkwardly to me.

Being a little pedantic. "for _a_ Debian system" 
 
> After all, as far as I am concerned Debian is the name of the
> operating system, it just happens to use a lot of code from the
> GNU project. Especially in the case of the version of Debian that
> uses The Hurd.

I would describe Debian as a series of GNU operating systems.  At the
moment GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd.  There may be others in the dim distant
future.

Being really pedantic "a Debian GNU system", but I don't like this as the
FSF may in the afore mentioned dim distant future start working on an
operating system that is not related to *nix and I would like to think
that Debian would be involved.  So I would want to stick with "a Debian
system".

Phil.

--
  Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
   +64 3 488 2818        Fax +64 3 488 2875        Mobile 025 267 9420
     philipc@copyleft.co.nz - preferred.          philipc@debian.org
     I sell GNU/Linux & GNU/Hurd CDs.   See http://www.copyleft.co.nz



Reply to: