flag day issue [kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp: what is libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 in ppc?]
To whom it may concern (mainly Jeff):
This might bite us when we have a flag day and do binary only recompile
uploads. We have to isolate the cases where there is an exact
version dependency and treat them seperately.
Marcus
----- Forwarded message from Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp> -----
X-Envelope-Sender: kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp
To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: what is libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 in ppc?
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133)
Resent-Message-ID: <NFIWcB.A.4CB.g_XD8@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/102385
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
Recently when I was upgrading sid system (ppc), dpkg complained
that locales 2.2.4-6 depended on glibc 2.2.4-6 but there was
no such file. In fact there is only libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 now.
What is this libc6 2.2.4-6.0.1 and why there is no associating
locales?
If this is already known problem, I'm very sorry.
Best regards, 2001.12.5
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: