Re: [JOB] mailx
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 03:27:01PM -0700, Known Human Nick Rusnov wrote:
> In message <[🔎] 20010719203356.G126@212.23.136.22>it was written:
> >Hi,
> >
> >mailx depends on MAXPATHLEN heavily.
>
> I'm looking at this. It seems a bit silly, though, to make the string
> handling for the strings that use MAXPATHLEN dynamic when it uses non-dynamic strings
> all over the place.
If everything is fixed, it might be feasible to allocate fixed strings based
on the length of the other fixed strings.
I haven't looked at the code. Not always is the best approach to use
malloc/realloc/free.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [JOB] mailx
- From: "Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo" <jkaivo@elijah.nodomainname.net>