Re: compiling packages
- To: Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: compiling packages
- From: Jeff Bailey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:32:47 -0800
- Message-id: <20010311103247.B20846@sparky.nisa.net>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>; from Brian May on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:12:37AM +1100
- References: <200102270118.f1R1Ijh17996@neuralgia.linnaean.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20010227023739.G700@ulysses.dhis.net> <email@example.com> <20010228121459.B349@ulysses.alg.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Brian, did you post these packages somewhere? I'd like to use them to
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:12:37AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Brian> anyway, I deleted the file, and compilation is continuing.
> Only libldap.so hasn't been linked against libsasl.so, which prevents
> compiling libnss_ldap. Not sure why, the libtool version looks high
> enough (1.3.5+OpenLDAP).
> Still this looks suspiciously like the problem I encountered with
> libsasl (-lsasl and other -llibraries are dropped from the command
> line), so I wonder if these OpenLDAP patches to libtool have broken it
> again. :-(
> Also the package dependencies for both SASL and openldap are broken,
> probably for the same reason that has already been discussed.
> ie. SASL doesn't depend on libdb2, and openldap doesn't depend on
> libsasl7. (other problems might exist, these are the ones I happen to
> Brian May <email@example.com>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
My UUism extends beyond national boundaries.