Re: compiling packages
- To: Brian May <bam@debian.org>, debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: compiling packages
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:32:47 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20010311103247.B20846@sparky.nisa.net>
- In-reply-to: <84itlu4d22.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>; from Brian May on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:12:37AM +1100
- References: <200102270118.f1R1Ijh17996@neuralgia.linnaean.org> <84bsro9abv.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <20010227023739.G700@ulysses.dhis.net> <84g0gz5o7w.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <20010228121459.B349@ulysses.alg.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> <84r90i4guk.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <84itlu4d22.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Brian, did you post these packages somewhere? I'd like to use them to
build sendmail.
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:12:37AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <bam@debian.org> writes:
>
> Brian> anyway, I deleted the file, and compilation is continuing.
>
> Success!
>
> Only libldap.so hasn't been linked against libsasl.so, which prevents
> compiling libnss_ldap. Not sure why, the libtool version looks high
> enough (1.3.5+OpenLDAP).
>
> Still this looks suspiciously like the problem I encountered with
> libsasl (-lsasl and other -llibraries are dropped from the command
> line), so I wonder if these OpenLDAP patches to libtool have broken it
> again. :-(
>
> Also the package dependencies for both SASL and openldap are broken,
> probably for the same reason that has already been discussed.
>
> ie. SASL doesn't depend on libdb2, and openldap doesn't depend on
> libsasl7. (other problems might exist, these are the ones I happen to
> notice).
> --
> Brian May <bam@debian.org>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
My UUism extends beyond national boundaries.
Reply to: