> 1. No one really wants to work on gnumach. > 2. OSkit-mach is too slow. The COM interface in oskit is (IMO) too > bloated (this is in regards to many people saying "use oskit-mach"). Do you mean relative to gnumach or just in general? Noone has reported anything about performance of oskit-mach to me. Not that I am against using L4 or other kernels, but there is a lot of work involved in that.