Re: L4 instead of gnumach?
Ron Farrer <rbf@farrer.net> writes:
> Many of us have had a discussion in #hurd on irc.openprojects.net. The
> discussion was about replacing gnumach with L4.
Yes, I was one of them. :]
> Reasons for doing this:
[...]
To add: We need a well defined goal, I think; a design which doesn't
change regularly. I mean, now we use GNUmach and there are plans to
use another Mach implementation. But, should we continue using Mach?
Note: This is in no ways a flame to the GNUmach developers.
moritz
--
/* Moritz Schulte <moritz@hp9001.fh-bielefeld.de>
* http://hp9001.fh-bielefeld.de/~moritz/
* PGP-Key available, encrypted Mail is welcome.
*/
Reply to: