Re: Major GNU/Hurd using report
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:55:50PM +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com> writes:
>
> > KGI is quite portable (some parts needs to be non-preemptive, possible on Mach ?)
>
> Why does it require that -- does it work on multiprocessors at
> all?
It was said that KGI needs to block brige (?) when doing
some operations (changing modes?) on some cards (dunno which ones)
> > I'm not going to try compiling gnumach in *near* term.
> > I had enough bad experience with Linux 2.3
> > and am affraid of kernels since then.
>
> Do you fear compiling it, or running the result?
running the result
Reply to: